Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit robynlewisTX.'s column >>

ROBYNLEWISTX.

Home Page
Never argue with a Liberal IDIOT. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience!
Articles Posted: 4  Links Seeded: 238
Member Since: 6/2009  Last Seen: 5/17/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Missouri teacher sues state over 'Facebook law,' says she can't contact her own child online

Seeded on Mon Aug 22, 2011 3:04 PM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: Yahoo! News
us-news, facebook, lawsuit, students, free-speech, teachers, aclu, contact
Seeded by robynlewisTX.
Advertise | AdChoices

A Missouri teacher has sued the state over a new law that prevents teachers from contacting their students over the Internet, arguing that it will make it illegal for her to chat with her own child over Facebook

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • robynlewisTX.'s Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: American- Right, American_Politics, Clinton Conservatives, Donkey Dung, FOX NEWS, Free Thinkers, Frosty's Igloo, Get On Your Soapbox, Lefties Collapse Brigade, rightwingers, True Americans, Zonie Conservatives
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (8)
robynlewisTX.

The American Civil Liberties Union, which is representing Thomas, argues that there are better ways to prevent teacher misconduct than infringing on free speech by blocking contact on social media sites.

Banning Facebook conversations and the like also amounts to a restriction on students' ability to communicate with their teachers, and in the courts, the extent to which school officials can dictate students' behavior online has been a contentious subject. The Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that administrators could punish a student who raised a "Bong hits 4 Jesus" banner across the street from his school because the banner created a "substantial disruption" within the school. Appeals courts have since tackled cases of disciplined students who say their off-campus online activity is free speech and not disruptive enough on campus to merit suspension.

State will lose on this one.

  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Aug 22, 2011 3:07 PM EDT
northern girl

What a stupid rule. In my son's school, the students and parents are encouraged to contact teachers by email. Especially for students who live out of town and cant stay after school for help because they have to ride the bus, email is a great way to get help with homework. At least with social networking, if a teacher makes inappropriate comments, its in writing where there is a record of it.

A teacher cant contact her own child online?!?! Seriously, can you say NANNY STATE?

  • 5 votes
#1.1 - Mon Aug 22, 2011 4:32 PM EDT
RatPoison

If you hire a teacher to do a job, and you've done your job in checking out their credentials etc... then what is the point in cutting down on a teacher's and student's ability to communicate? Seems to me that this is a non-issue if everybody is doing their job.

  • 1 vote
#1.2 - Tue Aug 23, 2011 10:44 AM EDT
merleliz

They are attacking a symptom instead of a disease. If the teacher is not interested in sexually abusing children, they could have them at their home for a sleep over with no harm done. If they are...do you really think that they can't "communicate" with the child in an inappropriate way if they are banned from using Facebook? Good Lord, every kid has a cell phone nowdays, do you really think the teacher can't simply text them? Or (gasp) actually CALL them on the phone...provided he/she didn't get a chance to just talk to them in class...a determined pedophile will find a way....they did before Facebook, they will even if it is banned.

  • 2 votes
#1.3 - Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:13 PM EDT
Reply
jazzman646

Yeah its ridiculous. They go after Teachers, and pedophiles are running wild!

  • 4 votes
Reply#2 - Mon Aug 22, 2011 7:14 PM EDT
jmom-1225464

Darn...I was beat to this seed. My guess is that the school likes the ability to monitor teachers' emails, at least their work emails. I think the blanket policy regarding FB is extreme. Like northern girl mentioned a message on FB, whether private or public, is still a written record. My question is does the school trust their teachers or not? Would they ban all interaction between teachers and students that wasn't on campus or linked to a campus email address/web address? Are they no longer allowed to interact with family members who are also teachers or school administrators? That seems to be the problem for the mom/teacher mentioned in the article. I don't like this rule...I think it is moving a little too far in the wrong direction and it means teachers can't be trusted.

  • 2 votes
Reply#3 - Mon Aug 22, 2011 7:21 PM EDT
northern girl

What happens is one of your parents is a teacher and you want to have friends over? Could that teacher's son have a sleep over or a birthday party at home, or would that be banned because a student would be staying at a teacher's house?

  • 3 votes
#3.1 - Tue Aug 23, 2011 8:36 AM EDT
jmom-1225464

Exactly, northern girl! What if a student was scheduled for his mom's math class or dad's English class? Are they no longer allowed to live at home because they will have private conversations? Sheesh! I hate it when policy makers don't think things through.

  • 2 votes
#3.2 - Tue Aug 23, 2011 10:44 AM EDT
Reply
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse |
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com